Thursday, April 30, 2009

Taliban Leader In Afghanistan Warns Of New Offensive


Apparently the upcoming "surge" of fresh American troops into the War in Afghanistan has the Taliban a bit edgy so one of their leaders has come out with a warning for both the U.S./NATO forces as well as the Afghan government...and has even suggested to the Afghan army that they drop their weapons and desert. Now, one thing to keep in mind here...the Taliban typically back up their threats much more often than say an al Qaeda group or Iranians, but at the same time, this threatened offensive is a bit vague. Here's some of the details from The Washington Post:


A senior leader of Afghanistan's Taliban warned Wednesday the movement will launch a new large-scale operation against the Afghan government, diplomatic missions, foreign troops and anyone supporting them.

Posted on a Taliban website, (www.alemarah1.org) a message quoting the deputy leader of the movement, Mullah Brother Akhund, said the "Nasrat" (victory), will begin Thursday and include ambushes, bombs and suicide bomb attacks.
"The targets of these operations will be the military units of the invading forces, diplomatic centers, mobile convoys, high-ranking officials of the puppet administration, members of parliament and personnel of the so-called defense, interior and national security ministries," the message said.
So, I would say that we will see at least a couple of fairly major attacks today - my guess is that there will be some sort of an attack on a government building in either Kabul or Kandahar and we may seem some sort of an ambush on a NATO convoy or a mini-offensive on a NATO outpost.


Afghan Taliban leader warns of new offensive

Through the offensive, the Taliban will seek to further tighten the encirclement of the enemy in the provinces and attack their supply routes, it added.
The message urged Afghan security forces to desert and join the militants and ordered private firms as well as individuals to stop working for the foreign troops.
U.S.-led troops overthrew the Taliban government after it refused to hand over al Qaeda leaders wanted by Washington for the September 11 2001 attacks on the United States.
The Taliban have made advances in recent years not only in Afghanistan, but also in neighboring Pakistan where they have some bases in the lawless tribal border region.
To fight the growing insurgency, the new administration in Washington has pledged to send an extra 21,000 troops this year to Afghanistan, where the level of foreign forces stand at more than 70,000.
The additional U.S. troops will be deployed mainly to the south east of the country.
The Taliban and al Qaeda leaders are still at large and thought to be in hiding in the tribal region on the Afghan-Pakistan border near to Pakistan's lawless northern tribal areas.

4 comments:

Sharku said...

Our troops aren't worried because, well we fight back, this new "spring offensive" will mean that school kids and women should be very worried though.

Holger Awakens said...

Exactly Shark...at the same time, if you work in a government building in Afghanistan, best have made your peace.

:Holger Danske

Lee, U.S. said...

One should wonder what yahoos like Nick Robertson are doing talking to wanted terrorists, and "giving them a voice." He pats himself on the back, saying without his report, we would be fighting in the dark. Nevertheless from his commentary, clearly Robertson has an agenda, that is to make the Taliban appear to be more moderate than Al Qaeda, perhaps someone America should be willing to deal with. I think giving people like the Taliban a platform to spread lies and propaganda about their policies is very counterproductive. If I want to know what the Taliban is thinking, I would prefer not to get that intelligence from anyone at CNN, who are biased against the interests of the U.S...decidedly against.

Anonymous said...

When I saw Robertson speak of them being cautious about them turning in a wanted man, I thought "of course he's going to turn him in!". Then I realized that no, he wasn't. He was going to meet with a known, wanted, vocal terrorist, ... and ask questions. Dial in a fighter strike, drive by and lob a few grenades, I don't care. But giving voice to a group of radical savages is decidedly not helping. Thanks to this behavior we may not be fighting in the dark but we'll still be fighting, and possibly for much longer if we help their movement gain momentum. Whose side is Robertson on?