Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Muslim Nations Demand U.N. Tracks 'Islamophobia' Incidents Across the World


Once again, we see the United Nations being wagged by the coalition of islamic states - this time, the muslim countries are demanding that the U.N. start tracking incidents of islamophobia that occur across the globe.

I wonder...what do you suppose those muslim nations would CONSIDER islamophobia? Hmmm. How about a protest in New York City against the Ground Zero Mosque? That would probably be on the list, yes? Would that mean that my name would go on an international record for attending that protest? How about if a muslim runs for U.S. Congress and is defeated....is that islamophobic? Or how about a muslim woman who interviews for a job at a department store and doesn't get the job? That's gotta be islamophobia, right?

So, just what does our American ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Commission have to say about this? From the article at CNSNews:

U.S. ambassador to the HRC Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe wrote to Pillay in late August, deploring Jones’ threatened action and telling her that the U.S. “supports the full use of your office and moral authority to speak out against intolerance and instances of hate speech where they occur.”


The term "islamophobia" is the new "racist." We live in a time now that the Soft Jihad is not just creeping across America, it is hauling ass. And in its wake is a nation of people duped and chained by a combination of political correctness and islamic deception. The sooner we understand that this is total manipulation by an enemy force, the sooner we can fight back.


Muslim Nations Call for U.N. to Track ‘Islamophobia’


The Quran-burning controversy in the United States has prompted the Islamic bloc at the United Nations to revive its call for the U.N. to set up an “international monitoring mechanism” to track incidents of “Islamophobia.”

Five years after establishing an “Islamophobia Observatory” of its own, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is now calling on the U.N.’s top human rights official to set up a comparable body at her Geneva office. According to the OIC, human rights commissioner Navanethem Pillay has agreed to consider the proposal.

At the U.N. Human Rights Council this week, OIC members are also seeking support for a resolution condemning Florida pastor Terry Jones’ abortive call to burn copies of the Quran on September 11.

Introduced by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC, the text condemns “the recent call by an extremist group to organize a ‘Burn a Koran Day’” and says it was among “instances of intolerance, discrimination, profiling and acts of violence against Muslims occurring in many parts of the world.”

When it comes to a vote -- before the Council’s session in Geneva ends next Friday -- the measure almost certainly will pass. The OIC controls more than one-third of the Council’s seats, and its resolutions are routinely backed by non-Muslim allies such as China, Russia, Cuba and South Africa.

Moreover, Western democracies which usually oppose OIC “Islamophobia” and “religious defamation” measures at the HRC – on freedom of expression grounds – will not likely do so in this case, having strongly condemned Jones’ threats earlier this month.

U.S. ambassador to the HRC Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe wrote to Pillay in late August, deploring Jones’ threatened action and telling her that the U.S. “supports the full use of your office and moral authority to speak out against intolerance and instances of hate speech where they occur.”

The new resolution was circulated in Geneva after OIC secretary-general Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, in an address to the Council, urged Pillay to set up an “observatory” in her office to monitor and document acts like threats to desecrate the Quran, and to report back to the HRC annually.

Ihsanoglu in his speech also said national government should take specific steps to combat religious intolerance and stereotyping, including “adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence based on religion.”

Ihsanoglu met separately with Pillay and, according to an OIC statement, told her that incidents like Quran desecration “posed grave danger to global peace, security and stability.”

He pressed for her office to set up an “observatory” or “international monitoring mechanism” to monitor and document such acts.

The OIC said Pillay has given Ihsanoglu her assurance that she would “look into reviving the issue of the observatory” proposal.

Asked to confirm this account, a spokesman for Pillay said he would look into the matter, but did not respond by press time.

The call for the U.N. to set up an “Islamophobia monitoring mechanism” was made as early as 1997, when Iran’s ambassador raised the issue at a General Assembly committee meeting. It was repeated during the controversial Durban conference against racism in 2001 and on occasions since.

The OIC set up its “Islamophobia Observatory” at its headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, as part of a 10-year plan of action adopted in 2005. The observatory issued its first report in March 2008, covering the period May-Dec. the previous year.

It has since issued two further reports, the most recent of which documented incidents in Western countries ranging from the Swiss ban on minaret building to complaints that pork was served in a supposedly vegetarian dish at a Christmas buffet for postal workers in Britain.

The same report cited President Obama’s June 2009 speech in Cairo, pledge to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and dropping of terminology seen as offensive to Muslims as optimistic indicators.

2 comments:

Sharku said...

Anymouse... that's sort of like wishing in one hand and shitting in the other. We all know which one fills faster.

Anonymous said...

I want to be free to be scared of ANY one, or ANY mob, ESPECIALLY that wanted it to be an offence to fear them. Let me choose my own phobia! Is there some hidden psi-ops going on that has not been WikiLeaked yet?